header-logo header-logo

04 October 2012
Issue: 7532 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Saga launches legal services

Over-50s to benefit from new legal service provider

Over-50s champion Saga has entered the legal market, offering fixed-price services in will-writing, power of attorney, conveyancing and probate.

Saga Legal, which launched this week, will charge a flat rate for conveyancing and set its probate fees according to the complexity of the estate rather than its value. It says this will help people who have benefited from the rise in house prices over the last couple of decades.

It will offer clients a legal essentials package, which includes unlimited legal advice by phone or e-mail, an online standard will and £100,000 of legal cover.

Saga offers its members a range of other services, including holidays, travel services, financial advice, a magazine, insurance and online dating.

Roger Ramsden, chief executive of Saga Services, says: “People want legal advice and products at a price they understand, can afford and that is agreed in advance.

“They want a clearer idea of what it is they are paying for; legal issues are complicated and the jargon used by the industry prevents many people from understanding the process.”

A survey of nearly 10,000 over-50s, conducted by Saga, revealed only four per cent believed the legal services market is fine as it is. Top complaints were spiralling solicitors’ bills, being bamboozled by jargon and poor value for money.

More than four out of five respondents said they wanted lawyers to offer fixed fees at the outset rather than hourly rates. Two-thirds called for letters and documents to be written in plain English rather than “legal jargon”.

Last month, LegalZoom announced it had teamed up with QualitySolicitors and would launch a range of personalised online legal contracts and documents later this year.

Issue: 7532 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll