header-logo header-logo

Salary forecast for 2021

27 January 2021
Issue: 7918 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail
Post-pandemic impact will see new challenges & flat salaries

Legal salaries are likely to remain flat in the UK and Middle East despite the redundancies, market uncertainty and other pandemic-related fallouts of the past year, according to legal recruiters IDEX Consulting.

The annual IDEX salary guide for the legal expertise industry, which uses data and research from the previous 12 months, found a 4.8% increase in candidates but 29% fewer jobs registered.

However, the legal sector had quickly returned to a more normal level as firms transitioned to working from home, with a significant increase in vacancies and market confidence towards the end of the year, IDEX found. Some 60% of business owners predicted higher sales and productivity levels in 2021, compared to 15% who predicted lower levels.

In terms of salary levels, the research found little change in legal sector jobs in the UK and the Middle East. According to the guide, solicitors with seven years’ post-qualification experience, for example, can expect £120,000+ at London City firms, £225,000+ (Magic Circle firms), £90,000+ (West End firms), £85,000–£115,000 (in-house IT/telecoms/pharma/business services), £60,000–£76,000 (Scotland, private practice) and £55,000–£70,000 (Middle East, regional).

IDEX predicts a high demand for firms to digitally up-skill their workforce this year, as the legal sector will rely more heavily on technology in the post-pandemic world. ‘Future lawyers will therefore need to demonstrate they can work with a multiple of software and hardware, with flexibility and show their digital expertise from the application process onwards,’ the report states.

Matt Green, CEO of IDEX, said: ‘There are so many unanswered questions about working practices, economic stability, vaccines, and even the ongoing complications of Brexit.

‘What we can be certain of in 2021 is that we will see many entirely new challenges for employers and individuals, as inflation is expected to rise again to 1.2%, while salary increases will remain flat at 2.5%.’

Issue: 7918 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll