header-logo header-logo

17 March 2007
Issue: 7264 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

SALE OF GOODS—DELIVERY—IMPLIED CONDITION

J & H Ritchie Ltd v Lloyd Ltd [2007] UKHL 9, [2007] All ER (D) 109 (Mar)

House of Lords
Lord Hope, Lord Scott, Lord Rodger, Lord Brown and Lord Mance
7 March 2007

Where parties have entered into a contract for the purchase of goods which develop a fault and are taken away for inspection and repair by the sellers, the sellers may be under an implied condition under the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (SGA 1979) to provide the buyers with information requested about the repairs, to enable the buyers to make a properly informed choice between accepting and rejecting the goods.

Charles Graham QC and Gillian Wade (instructed by McCartney Stewart, Renfrew) for the appellants
Colin Tyre QC and Pino Di Emidio (instructed by Balfour & Mason, Edinburgh) for the respondents.
The appellant company carried on a farming business. The respondent was a supplier of agricultural machinery based in Scotland. The appellant purchased as a single item a combination seed drill and power harrow (the harrow) from the respondent. A fault developed with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll