header-logo header-logo

07 November 2013
Issue: 7583 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Sarah Hannett—Sydney Elland Goldsmith Bar Pro Bono Award

web_sarah_starmove

Matrix Chambers barrister wins pro bono award

Sarah Hannett of Matrix Chambers has won the Sydney Elland Goldsmith Bar Pro Bono Award. The award was presented by the chairman of the Bar, Maura McGowan QC, at the Annual Bar Conference on 2 November. 

The award was set up in 1996 to recognise individual barristers or sets of chambers who demonstrate an inspirational commitment to pro bono work. Run by the Bar Pro Bono Unit, this year’s panel of judges was led by Lord Goldsmith QC.

Sarah is the founder of the City University Matrix School Exclusion Project, which provides pro bono representation to parents of children who have been permanently excluded from school. Since starting in 2011, the project has assisted 47 parents whose children face exclusion. 

Maura McGowan QC, says: “The Bar is extremely proud of the nominees’ tireless work to ensure that vulnerable people, who cannot afford representation or cannot access legal aid, have an avenue to justice.”

 

Issue: 7583 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll