header-logo header-logo

11 June 2014
Issue: 7610 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

SARAH law derided

One of the government’s flagship bills for the new term has been dismissed by personal injury lawyers as “at best, a complete waste of Parliamentary time”.

The Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Bill (SARAH)—also referred to as the “Heroes” Bill—is intended to protect those who step in to help others by requiring courts to take into account the context of an incident if a negligence case is brought. Writing in a blog on ConservativeHome last week, Justice secretary Chris Grayling said: “I hope that she [SARAH] will finally slay much of the “elf and safety” and jobsworth culture that holds back so much of our society.”

However, Jonathan Wheeler, vice president of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers, says: “The Compensation Act 2006 came into force to address public perception of a so-called ‘compensation culture’. Nine years later, we have the ‘Heroes’ Bill, which is apparently designed to reassure would-be heroes who hold back because they are afraid of being sued. 

“The government would be better spending its time and resources on education rather than legislation if the aim is to deal with public perception.”

Issue: 7610 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll