header-logo header-logo

11 June 2014
Issue: 7610 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

SARAH law derided

One of the government’s flagship bills for the new term has been dismissed by personal injury lawyers as “at best, a complete waste of Parliamentary time”.

The Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Bill (SARAH)—also referred to as the “Heroes” Bill—is intended to protect those who step in to help others by requiring courts to take into account the context of an incident if a negligence case is brought. Writing in a blog on ConservativeHome last week, Justice secretary Chris Grayling said: “I hope that she [SARAH] will finally slay much of the “elf and safety” and jobsworth culture that holds back so much of our society.”

However, Jonathan Wheeler, vice president of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers, says: “The Compensation Act 2006 came into force to address public perception of a so-called ‘compensation culture’. Nine years later, we have the ‘Heroes’ Bill, which is apparently designed to reassure would-be heroes who hold back because they are afraid of being sued. 

“The government would be better spending its time and resources on education rather than legislation if the aim is to deal with public perception.”

Issue: 7610 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll