header-logo header-logo

11 June 2014
Issue: 7610 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

SARAH law derided

One of the government’s flagship bills for the new term has been dismissed by personal injury lawyers as “at best, a complete waste of Parliamentary time”.

The Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Bill (SARAH)—also referred to as the “Heroes” Bill—is intended to protect those who step in to help others by requiring courts to take into account the context of an incident if a negligence case is brought. Writing in a blog on ConservativeHome last week, Justice secretary Chris Grayling said: “I hope that she [SARAH] will finally slay much of the “elf and safety” and jobsworth culture that holds back so much of our society.”

However, Jonathan Wheeler, vice president of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers, says: “The Compensation Act 2006 came into force to address public perception of a so-called ‘compensation culture’. Nine years later, we have the ‘Heroes’ Bill, which is apparently designed to reassure would-be heroes who hold back because they are afraid of being sued. 

“The government would be better spending its time and resources on education rather than legislation if the aim is to deal with public perception.”

Issue: 7610 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll