header-logo header-logo

15 August 2018
Issue: 7806 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

School exclusion was unlawful

Schools can no longer rely on an Equality Act exemption to exclude children with disabilities who have ‘a tendency to physically abuse’, following an Upper Tribunal decision.

The ruling, C&C v Governing Body [2018] UKUT 269 (AAC), could potentially affect thousands of schoolchildren with special educational needs.

A 13-year-old boy, L, was excluded for ‘a tendency to physically abuse’ even though his behaviour was linked to his autism. Pupils that fall under this category are usually considered exempt from the protection of the Equality Act 2010 under reg 4(1)(c), which means schools do not need to justify the exclusion.

Allowing L’s parents’ appeal, however, Judge Rowley said the use of the exemption came ‘nowhere near striking a fair balance between the rights of children such as L on the one side and the interests of the community on the other’.

‘Aggressive behaviour is not a choice for children with autism,’ she said. ‘To my mind it is repugnant to define as “criminal or anti-social” the effect of the behaviour of children whose condition (through no fault of their own) manifests itself in particular ways so as to justify treating them differently from children whose condition has other manifestations.’

Polly Sweeney, partner at Irwin Mitchell, which acted for the parents, said: ‘This decision does not mean that schools are prevented from excluding children where it is necessary and proportionate to do so. However, it will ensure all disabled children are afforded the same safeguards, protections and rights under the law regardless of whether their disability gives rise to challenging behaviour.’

A spokesperson for the Department for Education said: ‘We will be carefully considering the judgment and its implications before deciding the next steps.’

Issue: 7806 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Trowers & Hamlins—Rahul Sagar

Trowers & Hamlins—Rahul Sagar

Banking and finance practice bolstered by partner hire

mfg Solicitors—Ian Sheppard

mfg Solicitors—Ian Sheppard

Commercial litigation team welcomes senior associate in Birmingham

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll