header-logo header-logo

17 April 2008
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

School Spying

News In Brief

A council has admitted to using powers designed to track criminals to ensure a family wasn’t lying about where they lived to get their child into a school. Poole Borough Council says officers trained in Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 procedures “will attempt to establish if the family leave their stated address in the morning and return to it in the evening” if an application is believed to be fraudulent. Surveillance was undertaken when the family put their house up for sale but remained in the property until the end of January to allow their daughter to qualify for a school place.

Issue: 7317 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Public
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll