header-logo header-logo

10 July 2019
Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Scrutiny & standards in Parliament

Current procedures for scrutinising legislation in Parliament are ‘unsatisfactory’, the House of Lords Constitution Committee has said in a report.

The committee recommends that bills starting in the House of Lords pass through an evidence-taking stage, as currently happens with bills starting in the House of Commons. It raised concerns about the government practice of adding substantial new material to a bill late in its passage, curbing parliamentary scrutiny. Instead, it says, the bill or at least the new clauses should return to committee stage.

It also recommended the establishment of a Legislative Standards Committee in Parliament, to examine explanatory materials and assess their quality and consistency.

The report, ‘The Passage of Bills Through Parliament’, was published this week.

Committee chair Baroness Taylor of Bolton said: ‘Scrutiny of legislation is Parliament’s most important function.’

Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher—Julian Balson

Fieldfisher—Julian Balson

Indirect tax investigations and litigation specialist strengthens contentious tax offering

DMH Stallard—Seb Jones

DMH Stallard—Seb Jones

DMH Stallard makes Magic Circle hire

TV Edwards—Sarah Inchley, Caroline Andrews & Cheryl Thompson

TV Edwards—Sarah Inchley, Caroline Andrews & Cheryl Thompson

Three new Heads announced at leading London-based law firm

NEWS
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
Jonathan Fisher KC’s wide-ranging fraud report contains worthwhile proposals, but turning them into workable reform will require money, capacity and political will
back-to-top-scroll