header-logo header-logo

10 July 2019
Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Scrutiny & standards in Parliament

Current procedures for scrutinising legislation in Parliament are ‘unsatisfactory’, the House of Lords Constitution Committee has said in a report.

The committee recommends that bills starting in the House of Lords pass through an evidence-taking stage, as currently happens with bills starting in the House of Commons. It raised concerns about the government practice of adding substantial new material to a bill late in its passage, curbing parliamentary scrutiny. Instead, it says, the bill or at least the new clauses should return to committee stage.

It also recommended the establishment of a Legislative Standards Committee in Parliament, to examine explanatory materials and assess their quality and consistency.

The report, ‘The Passage of Bills Through Parliament’, was published this week.

Committee chair Baroness Taylor of Bolton said: ‘Scrutiny of legislation is Parliament’s most important function.’

Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

From global fraud cases to fishing off-grid, Mishcon de Reya’s chair of dispute resolution Hugo Plowman discusses mentors, management switching off

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law announces partner promotion and new hires amid a record year for enquiries

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis wills and probate team extends reach with two appointments

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll