header-logo header-logo

“Sea change” for competition law

01 October 2015
Issue: 7670 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The UK Consumer Rights Act came into force this week, consolidating existing consumer legislation and giving consumers and small businesses new powers to bring collective actions.

Under the Act, opt-out collective actions can be brought in the Competition Appeal Tribunal against companies for breach of competition law—“a significant sea change,” according to Mark Simpson, antitrust and competition partner at Norton Rose Fulbright.

The opt-out mechanism means claims can be brought by a group of litigants without the need to identify all the claimants individually. The opt-out aspect applies to UK consumers and businesses only, but foreign claimants can “opt in” to the claim if they wish to join.

Simpson says: “The first cases are likely to be cases where a clear group of consumers have been harmed by blatant anticompetitive conduct, such as a cartel or abuse of a dominant position that the competition authorities have already identified.

“Despite what is often thought, such straightforward cases do not arise that often as it will not always be clear whether an infringement of the legal rules caused loss to consumers, and it is a difficult and complex exercise to calculate and prove that loss in a court. The most significant implication for corporates is that the new opt-out regime in the UK opens a new front for class actions for antitrust actions, in addition to the well-known battlegrounds in the US and Canada.”

Issue: 7670 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll