header-logo header-logo

Search warrants: you’re under review...

22 June 2018 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7798 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail
nlj_7798_zander

Michael Zander QC distils current Law Commission proposals for a major reform of search warrant law

The Law Commission this month published a wide-ranging, 341-page consultation paper on what needs to be done about search warrant law. The consultation will run until 5 September.

The project, undertaken at the request of the Home Office, was triggered by judicial comments that search warrant law was unnecessarily complex, liable to give rise to challenges and in need of reform. There had been some 50 judicial reviews concerning search warrants since 2010. The cost of a defective search warrant could be significant ‘with entire investigations collapsing and potentially millions incurred by public bodies on legal fees and damages’. (para.1.2)

The consultation paper (No.235, www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/search-warrants/) poses 63 questions. Thirty-six of these are in the form of what it calls ‘provisional proposals’:

  • The statutory safeguards in PACE, ss 15 and 16 should apply to all criminal investigation search warrants. (Q.1)
  • Anyone who applies for a criminal investigation search warrant should be bound by Code B
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll