header-logo header-logo

Search warrants: you’re under review...

22 June 2018 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7798 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail
nlj_7798_zander

Michael Zander QC distils current Law Commission proposals for a major reform of search warrant law

The Law Commission this month published a wide-ranging, 341-page consultation paper on what needs to be done about search warrant law. The consultation will run until 5 September.

The project, undertaken at the request of the Home Office, was triggered by judicial comments that search warrant law was unnecessarily complex, liable to give rise to challenges and in need of reform. There had been some 50 judicial reviews concerning search warrants since 2010. The cost of a defective search warrant could be significant ‘with entire investigations collapsing and potentially millions incurred by public bodies on legal fees and damages’. (para.1.2)

The consultation paper (No.235, www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/search-warrants/) poses 63 questions. Thirty-six of these are in the form of what it calls ‘provisional proposals’:

  • The statutory safeguards in PACE, ss 15 and 16 should apply to all criminal investigation search warrants. (Q.1)
  • Anyone who applies for a criminal investigation search warrant should be bound by Code B
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll