header-logo header-logo

22 June 2018 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7798 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Search warrants: you’re under review...

nlj_7798_zander

Michael Zander QC distils current Law Commission proposals for a major reform of search warrant law

The Law Commission this month published a wide-ranging, 341-page consultation paper on what needs to be done about search warrant law. The consultation will run until 5 September.

The project, undertaken at the request of the Home Office, was triggered by judicial comments that search warrant law was unnecessarily complex, liable to give rise to challenges and in need of reform. There had been some 50 judicial reviews concerning search warrants since 2010. The cost of a defective search warrant could be significant ‘with entire investigations collapsing and potentially millions incurred by public bodies on legal fees and damages’. (para.1.2)

The consultation paper (No.235, www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/search-warrants/) poses 63 questions. Thirty-six of these are in the form of what it calls ‘provisional proposals’:

  • The statutory safeguards in PACE, ss 15 and 16 should apply to all criminal investigation search warrants. (Q.1)
  • Anyone who applies for a criminal investigation search warrant should be bound by Code B
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll