header-logo header-logo

03 October 2014 / Nicholas Bevan
Categories: Features , EU , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Second sight

Nicholas Bevan investigates a case exposing the UK’s failure to properly implement Community law minimum standards of compensatory protection

In June this year the High Court awarded damages to a badly injured car passenger, not as one might expect, against the negligent driver but against the secretary of state for transport instead. The decision attracted notoriety in the national press because the victim was also a petty criminal.

The real significance of this case lies in Mr Justice Jay’s meticulous comparative law analysis that exposes the UK’s long standing failure to properly implement Community law minimum standards of compensatory protection.

Unfortunate antecedents

In November 2006 the claimant, Sean Delaney sustained a serious head injury when he was involved in a head on collision. He had been travelling in a flashy sports car driven by Shane Pickett, who accepted full responsibility; Tradewise Insurance Services Ltd insured the vehicle.

The case was complicated somewhat when the emergency services discovered a large quantity of cannabis hidden in Delaney and Pickett’s clothing. Pickett was subsequently jailed for dangerous driving

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll