header-logo header-logo

23 October 2008
Issue: 7342 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Section 21 or bust?

Michael Walsh advises on how to avoid s 21 delays

One of the ways a landlord can seek possession of his property let under an Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST) is by issuing a notice under s 21 of the Housing Act 1988 (HA 1988). A notice can be served under s 21(1) or 21(4), with each being used in different situations. This article looks at the two notices and how landlords can avoid unnecessary delay and a visit to court by complying with some of the strict rules associated with the form of the notices.
Section 21(1) notices

A notice served under this sub-section is subject to fewer restrictions in terms of its content than those served under s 21(4) (which I deal with below). All that this sub-section requires is that the landlord gives the tenant “not less than two months' notice in writing” and that notice must state that the landlord requires possession of the property.

It is common for landlords to serve a s 21(1) notice on their tenants at the beginning

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll