header-logo header-logo

Section 21 or bust?

23 October 2008
Issue: 7342 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Michael Walsh advises on how to avoid s 21 delays

One of the ways a landlord can seek possession of his property let under an Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST) is by issuing a notice under s 21 of the Housing Act 1988 (HA 1988). A notice can be served under s 21(1) or 21(4), with each being used in different situations. This article looks at the two notices and how landlords can avoid unnecessary delay and a visit to court by complying with some of the strict rules associated with the form of the notices.
Section 21(1) notices

A notice served under this sub-section is subject to fewer restrictions in terms of its content than those served under s 21(4) (which I deal with below). All that this sub-section requires is that the landlord gives the tenant “not less than two months' notice in writing” and that notice must state that the landlord requires possession of the property.

It is common for landlords to serve a s 21(1) notice on their tenants at the beginning

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Law students and graduates can now apply to qualify as solicitors and barristers with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
back-to-top-scroll