header-logo header-logo

23 October 2008
Issue: 7342 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Section 21 or bust?

Michael Walsh advises on how to avoid s 21 delays

One of the ways a landlord can seek possession of his property let under an Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST) is by issuing a notice under s 21 of the Housing Act 1988 (HA 1988). A notice can be served under s 21(1) or 21(4), with each being used in different situations. This article looks at the two notices and how landlords can avoid unnecessary delay and a visit to court by complying with some of the strict rules associated with the form of the notices.
Section 21(1) notices

A notice served under this sub-section is subject to fewer restrictions in terms of its content than those served under s 21(4) (which I deal with below). All that this sub-section requires is that the landlord gives the tenant “not less than two months' notice in writing” and that notice must state that the landlord requires possession of the property.

It is common for landlords to serve a s 21(1) notice on their tenants at the beginning

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll