header-logo header-logo

Self-driving vehicles: the road ahead

01 September 2016 / Nicholas Bevan
Issue: 7712 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Nicholas Bevan reviews the implications of automated motor technology on road safety & legal practice

IN BRIEF

  • Important regulatory reform proposals for automated vehicle technology.
  • Road traffic accident practitioners have until 9 September to respond.

Road traffic accident practitioners are no doubt monitoring closely the rapid advance of automated motor technology. These increasingly sophisticated systems have important implications not just for road safety but also for legal practice as well as the regulatory framework that governs motor liability and insurance.

Transport revolution

We have become inured to the stubbornly high casualty statistics associated with road transport. The Department for Transport (DfT) inform us that there were 1,732 fatalities on our roads last year and several hundred thousand other casualties. Yet, this could be set to change. We are about to witness a revolution in transport, which by first restricting and ultimately removing entirely the scope for human driver-error, offers the prospect of dramatically improved road safety and, in consequence, cheaper motor insurance.

Last month the DfT published its latest proposals

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll