header-logo header-logo

Sent using MY iPad

04 April 2012 / Andrea Ward , Robert Jones
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Robert Jones & Andrea Ward examine the risks of the BYOD trend

BYOD Bring Your Own Device to work is a concept which has been around for years, but which has recently gained significant ground in the business market, due to the enormous popularity of tablet devices, smart phones and cloud-based services, which have proven their versatility to be beyond that offered by the traditional computer.
 
For businesses, consumerisation offers many benefits, which include a reduced spend on IT hardware, increased productivity and greater employee engagement. However, these short term gains could lead to significant losses if the extent to which BYOD is utilised is not regulated.

For all of the benefits of BYOD, some serious questions hang over its usefulness in the corporate world. Those questions are not simply limited to who owns the hardware and the content, although they are among the most pertinent. One must also question who is responsible for the safety, security and continued operation of personally owned devices, and then also question the extent
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll