header-logo header-logo

Sent using MY iPad

04 April 2012 / Andrea Ward , Robert Jones
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Robert Jones & Andrea Ward examine the risks of the BYOD trend

BYOD Bring Your Own Device to work is a concept which has been around for years, but which has recently gained significant ground in the business market, due to the enormous popularity of tablet devices, smart phones and cloud-based services, which have proven their versatility to be beyond that offered by the traditional computer.
 
For businesses, consumerisation offers many benefits, which include a reduced spend on IT hardware, increased productivity and greater employee engagement. However, these short term gains could lead to significant losses if the extent to which BYOD is utilised is not regulated.

For all of the benefits of BYOD, some serious questions hang over its usefulness in the corporate world. Those questions are not simply limited to who owns the hardware and the content, although they are among the most pertinent. One must also question who is responsible for the safety, security and continued operation of personally owned devices, and then also question the extent
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll