header-logo header-logo

04 April 2012 / Andrea Ward , Robert Jones
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Sent using MY iPad

Robert Jones & Andrea Ward examine the risks of the BYOD trend

BYOD Bring Your Own Device to work is a concept which has been around for years, but which has recently gained significant ground in the business market, due to the enormous popularity of tablet devices, smart phones and cloud-based services, which have proven their versatility to be beyond that offered by the traditional computer.
 
For businesses, consumerisation offers many benefits, which include a reduced spend on IT hardware, increased productivity and greater employee engagement. However, these short term gains could lead to significant losses if the extent to which BYOD is utilised is not regulated.

For all of the benefits of BYOD, some serious questions hang over its usefulness in the corporate world. Those questions are not simply limited to who owns the hardware and the content, although they are among the most pertinent. One must also question who is responsible for the safety, security and continued operation of personally owned devices, and then also question the
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll