header-logo header-logo

18 July 2025 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 8125 / Categories: Features , International , Constitutional law , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Separation of church & state

225826
How has a phrase that appears nowhere in the supreme law of the US managed to become part of it? Athelstane Aamodt considers the history

Of all of the phrases connected with the Constitution of the United States, the only phrase more famous than ‘the right of the people to keep and bear Arms’ must be ‘separation of church and state’. It has informed debates about the Establishment Clause found in the First Amendment for years. The American Constitution is also clear that ‘no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States’ (Article VI, Clause 3).

This all seems clear. Religion has no role to play in government in America. However, it becomes rather less clear when you realise that the phrase ‘separation of church and state’ does not appear anywhere in the Constitution at all. How, then, has a phrase that forms no part of the supreme law of the US managed to become part of it?

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll