header-logo header-logo

24 June 2026
Issue: 8167 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Serious Fraud Office secures extra funds from convicted fraudster

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has secured an extra £492,000 from a confiscation order in 2009 against Alan Edwin Gardner, after uncovering additional assets including equity in two UK properties

Gardner was convicted in June 2009 and sentenced to six years’ imprisonment by Worcester Crown Court after an SFO investigation found he defrauded British expats in Jakarta by persuading them to invest in what was a fictitious scheme.

Paul Napper, SFO’s head of proceeds of crime and international assistance division, said Gardner ‘exploited the trust of British people far from home, convincing them their savings were in safe hands while he spent every penny’.

Issue: 8167 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
back-to-top-scroll