header-logo header-logo

29 July 2022 / Suzanne Trask
Issue: 7989 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Serious injury in the frame

89113
Those working in creative fields with unpredictable earnings may face a greater challenge when claiming for life-altering injuries: Suzanne Trask sets out the key steps for painting an accurate picture
  • Further opportunity for claimants after injury may lead to greater residual potential for earning.
  • Witness and expert evidence are crucial in claims for more speculative loss of earnings.
  • Findings are fact-specific, based on evidence of the claimant’s likely success and how this may have sustained through their career.

Those in creative walks of life with uncertain earnings get a tougher ride when bringing a claim for their financial losses after a life-altering injury. While one artist shines, many others struggle to make a living.

Where there is a risk that those earnings won’t materialise, it makes sense this part of the case will be fought harder by a defendant. It’s possible the claimant won’t be able to satisfy the court of this earning potential.

Claimants and their legal teams must compile a greater depth of evidence, to portray

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll