header-logo header-logo

Serle Court—Jennifer Meech

05 October 2022
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
Chancery and commercial barrister joins Serle Court

Serle Court has welcomed Jennifer Meech to chambers as a full-time member effective from 1 October 2022.

Jennifer is an experienced chancery commercial barrister renowned for her work in insolvency, company and property litigation. She regularly acts for public companies, SMEs and individuals, and is experienced in dealing with matters on behalf of clients in the public eye.

Jennifer’s hire adds to Serle Court’s already established commercial litigation offering, and reinforces the set’s reputation as one of the leading chancery commercial barristers’ chambers.

Kathryn Purkis, Chambers Director, commented in relation to the hire, as follows: 'We are thrilled that Jennifer has decided to join chambers. Jennifer is a fantastic advocate with a strong reputation for dealing with complex chancery commercial disputes. Her practice fits perfectly with Serle Court’s offering and specifically enhances our commercial litigation, insolvency, company and property litigation teams. We very much look forward to welcoming her to chambers.'

Commenting on her move, Jennifer said: 'I am delighted to join Serle Court —a chambers at the very top of the chancery commercial bar. I look forward to catching up with new colleagues and contacts either in chambers or at the 5th International Trusts & Commercial Litigation Conference in New York in November.'

Jennifer was called to the Bar (Middle Temple) in 2008, and her practice focuses on commercial Chancery litigation with a particular expertise in insolvency, company and property disputes. She is particularly adept at dealing with cases where these areas intersect.

Jennifer was chair of the Insolvency Lawyers Association Associates’ Network Committee for several years and is now a member of that organisation’s Technical Committee, in addition to being a member of the Chancery Bar Association, R3 and International Women’s Insolvency & Restructuring Confederation. She also sat on the Property Bar Association committee for several years and was the instigator of that Association’s annual essay prize.

Jennifer recently acted for the respondent company and the majority shareholder in Re Decca Capital, a just and equitable winding-up petition and unfair prejudice petition; she was instructed in relation to an application for the recognition of Singaporean moratorium under the Cross Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 (Re H & C S Holdings Limited [2019] EQHC 1459).

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll