header-logo header-logo

Set in stone?

26 February 2014 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Opinion , Costs , CPR
printer mail-detail

Is Mitchell the last word on default, asks Dominic Regan

May Donoghue, Louisa Carlill, now Andrew John Bower Mitchell. These individuals have respectively stumbled into shaping the law of negligence, contract and now civil procedure.

Tough line

The tough line on default was recommended in the final Jackson report. Sir Rupert, in the conspectus of change which he penned as an introduction to the White Book Supplement (see the latest version in the October 2013 copy) explained that the new CPR 3.9 was both simpler than its predecessor but also “intended to be a stricter test limiting the cases in which it will be appropriate for the court to grant relief from sanctions”.

An eye-wateringly brutal test was applied by a unanimous and powerfully constituted court in Mitchell v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1537, [2013] All ER (D) 314 (Nov). A modest breach attracted a punitive penalty. I take no pleasure, truly, for having accurately predicted the outcome in answer to a question

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll