header-logo header-logo

06 March 2008 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7311 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Community care
printer mail-detail

Setting the PACE

Is a police officer’s duty to provide stop and search information absolute? Neil Parpworth investigates

Of the various powers available to the police to investigate criminal activity, the power to stop and search people is arguably the most controversial. That controversy relates not to the existence of the statutory powers—or at least not to the existence of those stop and search powers for which “reasonable suspicion” is a prerequisite—since few would deny that they are an essential weapon in the armoury of the police officer, but rather to the exercise of such powers.

A considerable body of research—much produced on behalf of the Home Office— suggests that stop and search powers are sometimes used in a discriminatory and disproportionate manner by police officers who are uncertain as to their scope and illinformed as to the safeguards which exist to prevent their abuse. One of those safeguards is the information requirements which are set down in the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE 1984), ss 2(2) and (3). In the recent case

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll