header-logo header-logo

Sex discrimination—Sexual orientation—Hotel policy

01 March 2012
Issue: 7503 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Hall and another v Bull and another [2012] EWCA Civ 83, [2012] All ER (D) 73 (Feb)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Sir Andrew Morritt C, Hooper and Rafferty LJJ, 10 Feb 2012

The refusal by devoutly religious hoteliers to let a double-bedded room to a homosexual couple constituted direct discrimination under the Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2007, (SI 2007/1263), (the 2007 Regulations) and, to the extent which the 2007 Regulations limit the manifestation of the hoteliers’ religious beliefs, the limitations are necessary in a democratic society for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

Robin Allen QC and Catherine Casserley (instructed by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission) for the claimants. James Dingemans QC and Sarah Crowther (instructed by Aughton Ainsworth) for the defendants.

The defendants were hoteliers and were devoutly religious. The claimants were in a homosexual relationship. They booked a double-bedded room at the defendants’ hotel. The defendants let single-bedded and twin-bedded rooms to anyone, regardless of marital status or sexual orientation, but

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll