header-logo header-logo

01 March 2012
Issue: 7503 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Sex discrimination—Sexual orientation—Hotel policy

Hall and another v Bull and another [2012] EWCA Civ 83, [2012] All ER (D) 73 (Feb)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Sir Andrew Morritt C, Hooper and Rafferty LJJ, 10 Feb 2012

The refusal by devoutly religious hoteliers to let a double-bedded room to a homosexual couple constituted direct discrimination under the Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2007, (SI 2007/1263), (the 2007 Regulations) and, to the extent which the 2007 Regulations limit the manifestation of the hoteliers’ religious beliefs, the limitations are necessary in a democratic society for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

Robin Allen QC and Catherine Casserley (instructed by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission) for the claimants. James Dingemans QC and Sarah Crowther (instructed by Aughton Ainsworth) for the defendants.

The defendants were hoteliers and were devoutly religious. The claimants were in a homosexual relationship. They booked a double-bedded room at the defendants’ hotel. The defendants let single-bedded and twin-bedded rooms to anyone, regardless of marital status or sexual orientation, but

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers welcomes new associate

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Ward Hadaway lawyer joins Birmingham Law Society Council

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons expands Chelmsford commercial litigation team with two appointments

NEWS
Construction workers injured in comparable accidents can face sharply different routes to compensation on opposite sides of the Atlantic
Victims of undue influence may have more options than simply unwinding a tainted transaction, with courts able to order profits accounts, compensation and, exceptionally, severance
Disabled people could lose vital safeguards following the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Cheshire West test for deprivation of liberty, two barristers warn
A formidable reputation cannot protect a law firm when partner departures, fragile finances and client uncertainty begin feeding each other
Businesses incorporating open-source software into commercial products could face obligations to disclose valuable source code, with AI-assisted development making licensing risks harder to track
back-to-top-scroll