header-logo header-logo

Sex discrimination—Sexual orientation—Hotel policy

01 March 2012
Issue: 7503 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Hall and another v Bull and another [2012] EWCA Civ 83, [2012] All ER (D) 73 (Feb)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Sir Andrew Morritt C, Hooper and Rafferty LJJ, 10 Feb 2012

The refusal by devoutly religious hoteliers to let a double-bedded room to a homosexual couple constituted direct discrimination under the Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2007, (SI 2007/1263), (the 2007 Regulations) and, to the extent which the 2007 Regulations limit the manifestation of the hoteliers’ religious beliefs, the limitations are necessary in a democratic society for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

Robin Allen QC and Catherine Casserley (instructed by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission) for the claimants. James Dingemans QC and Sarah Crowther (instructed by Aughton Ainsworth) for the defendants.

The defendants were hoteliers and were devoutly religious. The claimants were in a homosexual relationship. They booked a double-bedded room at the defendants’ hotel. The defendants let single-bedded and twin-bedded rooms to anyone, regardless of marital status or sexual orientation, but

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll