header-logo header-logo

17 August 2016
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

SFO steps up on "compelled" interviews

City law firm RPC says the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) is ramping up its use of "compelled interviews", citing a 37% rise on last year from 117 up to 129.

"Compelled" interviews require witnesses, not suspects, to attend interviews with the SFO, where they can also be compelled to supply documents that the SFO believes could help with an investigation.

Richard Burger, partner at RPC, says: “For many people, a compelled interview will be their first encounter with law enforcement officers and the process itself is often very disconcerting.”

Witnesses forced to supply information to the SFO are permitted to be represented by a lawyer—at their own expense. When an employee is compelled to be interviewed in an investigation against their employer, the SFO, however, is likely to object to them being represented by a lawyer that represents their firm.

RPC says that this underlines the importance for directors and senior managers to make sure the cost of personal legal representation is properly covered under their company’s Directors and Officers insurance policy. 

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll