header-logo header-logo

19 May 2017
Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

SFO/NCA merger pledge: ‘A backward step’

The Conservative Party has announced plans to merge the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) with the National Crime Agency (NCA). In its 2017 election manifesto, the Conservatives say merging the two organisations will ‘strengthen Britain’s response to white collar crime … improving intelligence sharing and bolstering the investigation of serious fraud, money laundering and financial crime’. The former head of the SFO anti-corruption and proceeds of crime unit called the move a ‘backward step’ which destroys the momentum the SFO has built with its use of deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs).

Commenting on the Conservative Party plans Robert Amaee, the former SFO head of anti-corruption and proceeds of crime and now Quinn Emanuel partner, said the move will fundamentally alter the SFOs specialist nature.

‘This move will split apart specialist investigators and prosecutors, something that was the cornerstone of Lord Roskill’s model which set up the SFO, and hands their work load to the already overburdened NCA and Crown Prosecution Service,’ he said.

He continued: ‘The work that the SFO is currently undertaking will, under these plans, end up having to compete for resource and priority with other incredibly important work at the NCA, including the combatting of terrorism, narcotics trafficking, human tracking and sexual exploitation.’

During her time as Home Secretary Theresa May was understood to have made attempts to fold the SFO into the NCA. Amaee said: ‘The disbanding of the SFO has been a long-standing goal of Theresa May, and it seems that now, with the outcome of the UK’s general election seemingly a foregone conclusion, she has grabbed her opportunity with both hands.’

David Corker, partner at Corker Binning, called the pledge ‘a pity’ saying that under its current director, SFO was proving ‘its effectiveness as a specialist economic crime enforcer’.

‘Its work on overseas bribery and raising corporate standards in that regard is world-class.’

He continued: ‘The NCA has not yet proved its effectiveness and there is a great danger that the fight against fraud would be compromised if the SFO’s work was absorbed into its broad remit.’

Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll