header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
20 July 2012 / Michael Brace
Issue: 7523 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

A shady business

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Michael Brace analyses the power to strike out fraudulent claims at trial

In Fairclough Homes Ltd v Summers [2012] UKSC 26, [2012] All ER (D) 179 (Jun), the respondent suffered serious hand and leg fractures in an accident at work in May 2003. In August 2007, the county court entered judgment for the respondent on liability with damages to be assessed. Undercover surveillance between October 2007 and September 2008 revealed him to have grossly exaggerated the effect of his injuries and his inability to work. The respondent’s initial schedule of loss claimed damages of £838,616.

Revised schedule of loss

After disclosure of the surveillance evidence, the schedule of loss was revised downwards to approximately £250,000. At the trial on damages the judge found there was no doubt that the respondent had suffered serious fractures requiring at least two operations. However, he also held that the respondent had deliberately lied about ongoing symptoms in and after March 2007. The judge restricted the loss of earnings claim to June 2007 and in addition made

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll