header-logo header-logo

31 January 2008 / Eoin O’Shea
Issue: 7306 / Categories: Features , Company , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Shady Dealings

The UK needs to improve its woeful record on combating bribery, says Eoin O’Shea

Corruption is seen as a major cause of global poverty and instability. In 1997 the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) adopted its Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials (the OECD Convention). The OECD Convention requires signatory countries to enact legislation which criminalises bribery of foreign public officials and which establishes the jurisdiction of their courts for offences by their nationals which occur abroad.

 

The OECD monitoring of compliance with the OECD Convention has not been universally complimentary towards the . It has criticised the fact that there have been no prosecutions of overseas bribery since the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 established “long arm” jurisdiction for bribery. This has been attributed, in part, to the complexity of the present law. In the meantime, the decision of the Serious Fraud Office to discontinue its investigation into the Al-Yamamah arms deal of the 1980s has attracted significant media attention.

COMPREHENSIVE OVERHAUL

There

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll