header-logo header-logo

16 August 2019 / George Sim
Issue: 7856 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness , Company
printer mail-detail

Shareholders in dispute

George Sim considers the valuation of shareholdings when shareholders fall out
  • Determining the valuation of a shareholding.
  • Addressing the company’s financial management.

As the economy’s growth rate slows, financial pressures on companies of all sizes are increasing. A harsher economic climate tends to lead to increased scrutiny by shareholders of company performance and one consequence may be an increase in disputes between shareholders. Such disputes may be protracted and emotive: they may also be complex in cases where the same shareholders control a group of companies.

This article outlines the causes of disputes and the remedies available to shareholders together with the valuation and investigation work which will need to be undertaken to enable the available remedies to be effective.

Causes of disputes

Shareholder disputes may arise for a variety of reasons. Individual shareholders or groups of shareholders may feel that they have insufficient influence over the direction of the company. Alternatively, there may be irreconcilable differences between the aims of specific shareholders: for example, a shareholder/director

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll