header-logo header-logo

Shareholders in dispute

16 August 2019 / George Sim
Issue: 7856 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness , Company
printer mail-detail
George Sim considers the valuation of shareholdings when shareholders fall out
  • Determining the valuation of a shareholding.
  • Addressing the company’s financial management.

As the economy’s growth rate slows, financial pressures on companies of all sizes are increasing. A harsher economic climate tends to lead to increased scrutiny by shareholders of company performance and one consequence may be an increase in disputes between shareholders. Such disputes may be protracted and emotive: they may also be complex in cases where the same shareholders control a group of companies.

This article outlines the causes of disputes and the remedies available to shareholders together with the valuation and investigation work which will need to be undertaken to enable the available remedies to be effective.

Causes of disputes

Shareholder disputes may arise for a variety of reasons. Individual shareholders or groups of shareholders may feel that they have insufficient influence over the direction of the company. Alternatively, there may be irreconcilable differences between the aims of specific shareholders: for example, a shareholder/director

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll