header-logo header-logo

15 September 2011 / Eleanor Kelly
Issue: 7481 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Shareholders say no

Eleanor Kelly charts the rise of opposition to directors’ remuneration

Many company directors will have noted with a mixture of interest and trepidation the increase in the level of discontent over the issue of directors’ remuneration at many listed company annual general meetings this year.

PIRC report

The rise in shareholder opposition to directors’ pay was highlighted in a report published by shareholder advisory group Pensions Investment Research Consultants Ltd (PIRC) on voting trends across 287 companies in the first six months of 2011.

This revealed that in the year to the end of June 2011, the average vote against the directors’ remuneration report was 6.1%, and average abstentions were 3.14%. This reflects a 0.5% rise in opposition compared to the first six months of 2010 and a 2.8% rise since 2008. PIRC also reported that in 2008, 82.6% of reports were approved with less than 5% of shareholders voting against the resolution, compared to only 66% this year.

Cable & Wireless

One of most publicised cases of shareholder revolt against directors’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll