header-logo header-logo

15 September 2011 / Eleanor Kelly
Issue: 7481 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Shareholders say no

Eleanor Kelly charts the rise of opposition to directors’ remuneration

Many company directors will have noted with a mixture of interest and trepidation the increase in the level of discontent over the issue of directors’ remuneration at many listed company annual general meetings this year.

PIRC report

The rise in shareholder opposition to directors’ pay was highlighted in a report published by shareholder advisory group Pensions Investment Research Consultants Ltd (PIRC) on voting trends across 287 companies in the first six months of 2011.

This revealed that in the year to the end of June 2011, the average vote against the directors’ remuneration report was 6.1%, and average abstentions were 3.14%. This reflects a 0.5% rise in opposition compared to the first six months of 2010 and a 2.8% rise since 2008. PIRC also reported that in 2008, 82.6% of reports were approved with less than 5% of shareholders voting against the resolution, compared to only 66% this year.

Cable & Wireless

One of most publicised cases of shareholder revolt against directors’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll