header-logo header-logo

Shipping

28 October 2011
Issue: 7487 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

National Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia v BP Oil Supply Company [2011] EWCA Civ 1127, [2011] All ER (D) 139 (Oct)

The touchstone of the approach to the question of whether a claim was time-barred pursuant to a charterparty time-bar clause was a requirement of clarity sufficient to achieve certainty rather than a requirement of strict compliance which, if applied inflexibly, could lead to uncommercial results. The basic requirement of cl 20.1 of the BPVOY 4 form was that a charterer should have received both the claim and the supporting documentation within the stipulated period. In approaching that issue, a pedantic or strict approach which focused on the form of the presentation rather than the substance should not be adopted. Consequently, the documentation supporting a demurrage claim did not have to be all presented together.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll