header-logo header-logo

Shipping—Charterparty—Right to terminate charter

01 December 2011
Issue: 7492 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Parbulk II A/S v Heritage Maritime Ltd SA [2011] EWHC 2917 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 155 (Nov)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, Eder J, 8 Nov 2011

There is no authority in the field of landlord and tenant to the effect that an unambiguous demand of rent operated in law as an automatic waiver of the right of forfeiture; even if there is, it is questionable whether the principle applies beyond that particular field.

David Joseph QC (instructed by Lawrence Graham) for the charterer. David Lewis (instructed by Wikborg Rein) for the owner.

The parties entered into a bareboat charterparty of the owner’s vessel from December 2007 until December 2014. From 16 April 2009, however, no hire was paid by the charterer. When the instalment that was due on 16 April 2009 was not paid, the owner sent a written notice reminding the charterer that if payment was not remedied within three banking days, that constituted an event of default under the terms of the charter which entitled the owner to terminate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll