header-logo header-logo

Shipping—Charterparty—Right to terminate charter

01 December 2011
Issue: 7492 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Parbulk II A/S v Heritage Maritime Ltd SA [2011] EWHC 2917 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 155 (Nov)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, Eder J, 8 Nov 2011

There is no authority in the field of landlord and tenant to the effect that an unambiguous demand of rent operated in law as an automatic waiver of the right of forfeiture; even if there is, it is questionable whether the principle applies beyond that particular field.

David Joseph QC (instructed by Lawrence Graham) for the charterer. David Lewis (instructed by Wikborg Rein) for the owner.

The parties entered into a bareboat charterparty of the owner’s vessel from December 2007 until December 2014. From 16 April 2009, however, no hire was paid by the charterer. When the instalment that was due on 16 April 2009 was not paid, the owner sent a written notice reminding the charterer that if payment was not remedied within three banking days, that constituted an event of default under the terms of the charter which entitled the owner to terminate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll