header-logo header-logo

01 December 2011
Issue: 7492 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Shipping—Charterparty—Right to terminate charter

Parbulk II A/S v Heritage Maritime Ltd SA [2011] EWHC 2917 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 155 (Nov)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, Eder J, 8 Nov 2011

There is no authority in the field of landlord and tenant to the effect that an unambiguous demand of rent operated in law as an automatic waiver of the right of forfeiture; even if there is, it is questionable whether the principle applies beyond that particular field.

David Joseph QC (instructed by Lawrence Graham) for the charterer. David Lewis (instructed by Wikborg Rein) for the owner.

The parties entered into a bareboat charterparty of the owner’s vessel from December 2007 until December 2014. From 16 April 2009, however, no hire was paid by the charterer. When the instalment that was due on 16 April 2009 was not paid, the owner sent a written notice reminding the charterer that if payment was not remedied within three banking days, that constituted an event of default under the terms of the charter which entitled the owner to terminate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll