header-logo header-logo

Shipping—Charterparty—Right to terminate charter

01 December 2011
Issue: 7492 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Parbulk II A/S v Heritage Maritime Ltd SA [2011] EWHC 2917 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 155 (Nov)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, Eder J, 8 Nov 2011

There is no authority in the field of landlord and tenant to the effect that an unambiguous demand of rent operated in law as an automatic waiver of the right of forfeiture; even if there is, it is questionable whether the principle applies beyond that particular field.

David Joseph QC (instructed by Lawrence Graham) for the charterer. David Lewis (instructed by Wikborg Rein) for the owner.

The parties entered into a bareboat charterparty of the owner’s vessel from December 2007 until December 2014. From 16 April 2009, however, no hire was paid by the charterer. When the instalment that was due on 16 April 2009 was not paid, the owner sent a written notice reminding the charterer that if payment was not remedied within three banking days, that constituted an event of default under the terms of the charter which entitled the owner to terminate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll