header-logo header-logo

15 June 2012 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7518 / Categories: Opinion , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Shopping around

Consumers are starting to flex their “buying muscle”, says Jon Robins

Should lawyers need further convincing that the main point about the Clementi reforms, the Legal Services Act and now the new alternative business structure market entrants is improving the lot of the consumer (and not inconveniencing lawyers), then it’s well worth checking out the Legal Services Consumer Panel’s (LSCP) Tracker survey which came out at the end of last month .

“The success of the reform should be ultimately be judged by how consumers experience legal services,” begins this annual health-check. Quite. It is only “year 2” for the survey but it promises to become a vital measure of the effectiveness of changes in the newly liberalised legal services sector. Two key indicators of the changing market, as correctly identified by the LSCP, independent research arm of the Legal Services Board, are increasing choice of provider and price certainty—in particular, the preparedness of consumers to “shop around” for legal services and the availability of fixed fees.

The consumer’s buying muscle

Just over

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll