header-logo header-logo

15 June 2012 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7518 / Categories: Opinion , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Shopping around

Consumers are starting to flex their “buying muscle”, says Jon Robins

Should lawyers need further convincing that the main point about the Clementi reforms, the Legal Services Act and now the new alternative business structure market entrants is improving the lot of the consumer (and not inconveniencing lawyers), then it’s well worth checking out the Legal Services Consumer Panel’s (LSCP) Tracker survey which came out at the end of last month .

“The success of the reform should be ultimately be judged by how consumers experience legal services,” begins this annual health-check. Quite. It is only “year 2” for the survey but it promises to become a vital measure of the effectiveness of changes in the newly liberalised legal services sector. Two key indicators of the changing market, as correctly identified by the LSCP, independent research arm of the Legal Services Board, are increasing choice of provider and price certainty—in particular, the preparedness of consumers to “shop around” for legal services and the availability of fixed fees.

The consumer’s buying muscle

Just over

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll