header-logo header-logo

Shopping around

15 June 2012 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7518 / Categories: Opinion , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Consumers are starting to flex their “buying muscle”, says Jon Robins

Should lawyers need further convincing that the main point about the Clementi reforms, the Legal Services Act and now the new alternative business structure market entrants is improving the lot of the consumer (and not inconveniencing lawyers), then it’s well worth checking out the Legal Services Consumer Panel’s (LSCP) Tracker survey which came out at the end of last month .

“The success of the reform should be ultimately be judged by how consumers experience legal services,” begins this annual health-check. Quite. It is only “year 2” for the survey but it promises to become a vital measure of the effectiveness of changes in the newly liberalised legal services sector. Two key indicators of the changing market, as correctly identified by the LSCP, independent research arm of the Legal Services Board, are increasing choice of provider and price certainty—in particular, the preparedness of consumers to “shop around” for legal services and the availability of fixed fees.

The consumer’s buying muscle

Just over

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll