header-logo header-logo

A shot in the arm?

24 March 2011 / Clare Arthurs , Emma Sparshott
Issue: 7458 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Emma Sparshott & Clare Arthurs investigate the blanket of expert immunity

As matters currently stand, expert witnesses in civil proceedings are immune from being sued in respect of any oral evidence given in court and the contents of the reports which they are instructed to produce.

Recently, however, this immunity has been challenged in the Supreme Court. In Jones v Kaney [2010] EWHC 61, an expert witness claimed immunity as a defence to a claim for professional negligence. Mr Jones alleged that Dr Kaney’s conduct in signing a joint statement which contradicted her earlier statements resulted in the case being settled for a significantly reduced sum.

The judge in Jones was bound by a Court of Appeal authority to strike out the claim. Stanton v Callaghan [1998] EWCA Civ 1176, provides absolute immunity from suit to witnesses of fact, including experts. However, Blake J granted Mr Jones a leapfrog certificate to the Supreme Court on two grounds: that a blanket policy of immunity for all expert witnesses may be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll