header-logo header-logo

17 March 2021 / Jennifer Egsgard
Issue: 7925 / Categories: Features , Profession , Mediation , International justice , ADR
printer mail-detail

Should mediation be mandatory?

42839
Mandatory mediation: an impossible contradiction? Not in Ontario, Canada. Jennifer Egsgard reports.
  • Mandatory mediation in Ontario: how it works.
  • Evaluation of Ontario’s Mandatory Mediation Program.
  • Current lawyer views on Ontario Mandatory Mediation Program.
  • Increase in virtual mediations with COVID-19.

Should mediation ever be mandatory? While a subject of debate in the UK, nearly 20 years ago Ontario rule-makers answered ‘yes’ to this question. Since then, in three major cities mediation has been required in most civil litigation. Mandatory mediation in Ontario was shown to decrease time to settle cases, decrease cost to litigants, and increase satisfaction among lawyers and parties, among other benefits. Recent surveys of Ontario lawyers indicate that the vast majority of respondents would like mandatory mediation to be geographically expanded, showing satisfaction with the program. In September 2020, the Ontario Bar Association and other Ontario lawyer groups made formal recommendations to the Attorney General of Ontario that mandatory mediation be expanded geographically, and these recommendations are currently being considered by the government. Given the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll