header-logo header-logo

17 March 2021 / Jennifer Egsgard
Issue: 7925 / Categories: Features , Profession , Mediation , International justice , ADR
printer mail-detail

Should mediation be mandatory?

42839
Mandatory mediation: an impossible contradiction? Not in Ontario, Canada. Jennifer Egsgard reports.
  • Mandatory mediation in Ontario: how it works.
  • Evaluation of Ontario’s Mandatory Mediation Program.
  • Current lawyer views on Ontario Mandatory Mediation Program.
  • Increase in virtual mediations with COVID-19.

Should mediation ever be mandatory? While a subject of debate in the UK, nearly 20 years ago Ontario rule-makers answered ‘yes’ to this question. Since then, in three major cities mediation has been required in most civil litigation. Mandatory mediation in Ontario was shown to decrease time to settle cases, decrease cost to litigants, and increase satisfaction among lawyers and parties, among other benefits. Recent surveys of Ontario lawyers indicate that the vast majority of respondents would like mandatory mediation to be geographically expanded, showing satisfaction with the program. In September 2020, the Ontario Bar Association and other Ontario lawyer groups made formal recommendations to the Attorney General of Ontario that mandatory mediation be expanded geographically, and these recommendations are currently being considered by the government. Given the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll