header-logo header-logo

Shutting the stable door

03 September 2009 / David Dabbs
Issue: 7383 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

David Dabbs watches statutory time limits passing by

Every good litigator ensures that all causes of action available to the (correct) client are pleaded out and incorporated within the statement of case before the limitation period expires: for the court’s residual discretion to permit an amendment after the expiry of a critical limitation period (CPR Pt 17, r 4) is severely restricted. Once the statutory time limit has expired the court has no discretion to permit an amendment which has the effect of adding a new cause of action or adding/swapping a party who may have known enough to appreciate that he had a cause of action during the limitation period, but let it pass (Limitation Act 1980, s 35). An attempt to amend after expiry would likely be an abuse of process and struck out [CPR Pt 3.4(2)(b)]—a classic case of trying to shut the door after the horse has bolted.
 

Exception
 

The trouble is, every litigator also knows that there is usually at least one exception to every rule; and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll