header-logo header-logo

Siblings lose inheritance tax battle

01 May 2008
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Wills & Probate , Human rights
printer mail-detail

News

Two elderly sisters have lost their European Court of Human Rights’ appeal against inheritance tax liability.

Joyce and Sybil Burden— both in their 80s—have shared the house they inherited from their father for 30 years. They appealed to the Grand Chamber to overturn the ruling of the lower court that they should be liable for inheritance tax when one dies. The unmarried sisters claimed they were victims of discrimination since they are prevented by law from entering into a civil partnership and thus cannot take advantage of the exemption to paying any inheritance tax on the first death.

However, the Grand Chamber found by a 15-2 majority that because the sisters’ relationship was of a different nature to that of married couples and homosexual partners they had not suffered discrimination. Julian Washington, a partner at Forsters LLP, says there will be sighs of relief at the Treasury. “The Grand Chamber decided the UK government was entitled to give preferential tax treatment to spouses (and now same sex civil partners). The relationship of the two sisters was quite different: they had chosen to cohabit as siblings but they did not fall into the privileged categories which the UK was entitled to recognise,” he says.

Issue: 7319 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Wills & Probate , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll