header-logo header-logo

04 March 2022 / David Locke
Issue: 7969 / Categories: Opinion , International , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Sidelining the legal system

73775
Never take our liberties for granted, says David Locke

Imagine a hypothetical scenario: In London this week, a demonstration is taking place against a government ‘vaccine passport’ policy arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. It is causing local inconvenience, but it is peaceful and some of the demonstrators have even brought their children and pets along. A woman watching the news at home is sympathetic to the aims of the protestors, which are neither illegal nor immoral, and contributes a small sum of money to their campaign using a popular online crowdfunding website. For that matter, many other people make contributions and the total donations are reaching £7.5m. A young couple who own a small independent coffee shop in the locality of the demonstration are also sympathetic. They give the protesters free coffee and let some of them huddle inside the premises from time-to-time, because it is bitterly cold outside given the time of year.

Imagine then the response of the government is as follows: legislation which has been on the books

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll