header-logo header-logo

08 March 2012 / Mark Warwick
Issue: 7504 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Signing your life away?

Mark Warwick studies the requirements of a legitimate will

On 31 January 2012 and 2 February 2012, the Court of Appeal handed down judgments dealing with the formalities required for the making of a will. In each case the court was faced with a conflict between upholding the testator’s intention and enforcing the requirements of s 9 of the Wills Act 1837 (WA 1837). Although the two judgments were plainly prepared by differently constituted Courts of Appeal in ignorance of one another, the judgments adopt a similar approach to the construction of s 9. This approach is one that demands an insistence upon exact compliance with the statutory requirements for the making of a will contained within s 9.

Literalism v intention

Since, in other fields, such as the construction of contracts, literalism often gives way to the party’s intentions, it is important to recognise that the formalities required to make a valid will are strictly enforced. It is for this reason, if no other, that the recent cases justify examination.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll