header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 162, Issue 7504

08 March 2012
IN THIS ISSUE

Julian Chamberlayne describes how retrospective & discounted CFAs are treated by the court

There will soon be no hiding place for bloggers warn Graham Huntley & Charlie Clarke-Jervoise

Dominic Regan reports from the front line

Geoffrey Bindman QC regrets the prosecution of Judge Baltasar Garzón

Family law reform should be handled with care advises David Burrows

Mark Whitcombe unravels the rights of fixed share partners

The test governing the construction of documents is objective, note Joanna Bhatia & Malcolm Dowden

Khawar Qureshi QC reports on the recent leading cases involving public international law & the English courts

Michael Tringham reports on invalid, void & forged wills

Mark Warwick studies the requirements of a legitimate will

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll