header-logo header-logo

09 March 2012 / Mark Whitcombe
Issue: 7504 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

A matter of definition?

Mark Whitcombe unravels the rights of fixed share partners

The recent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Tiffin v Lester Aldridge LLP [2012] EWCA Civ 35, [2012] All ER (D) 37 (Feb) clarifies the law governing the employment status of “fixed share” partners in limited liability partnerships (LLPs) and is equally relevant to cases involving conventional partnerships. It is well known that in order to bring claims of unfair dismissal or breach of contract in an employment tribunal the claimant must establish that he falls within the definition of “employee” in s 230(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996). Tiffin is now the starting point for any consideration of the employment rights of LLP members, and is the first time that the Court of Appeal has considered s 4(4) of the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 (LLPA 2000).

The applicable law

Section 4(4) of LLPA 2000 is badly drafted: “A member of a limited liability partnership shall not be regarded for any purpose as employed by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll