header-logo header-logo

A global view

09 March 2012 / Khawar Qureshi KC
Issue: 7504 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Khawar Qureshi QC reports on the recent leading cases involving public international law & the English courts

There has been a surge in public awareness of public international law (PIL) in recent years, as well as a marked increase in the number of cases before domestic courts where PIL issues have been raised. The main factors for this include:

  • Significant activity of the UN Security Council (UNSC) in passing sanctions resolutions directed to alleged terrorist funding and so-called “rogue” states.
  • The invocation of English Court jurisdiction to address matters arising out of the military interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan.
  • Claims for diplomatic or sovereign/state immunity to prevent the courts from exercising jurisdiction to consider claims, or effect enforcement of judgments or arbitral awards.

In 2011, there were 179 cases identified in the Lawtel database as involving international law. However, most of these concern private international law (conflict of laws) issues. Upon closer examination, around 15 of the cases concerned substantive PIL issues.

In this article, we will consider six cases relating to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll