header-logo header-logo

Justice on trial

09 March 2012 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7504 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Geoffrey Bindman QC regrets the prosecution of Judge Baltasar Garzón

The unprecedented prosecution of Judge Baltasar Garzón in Spain has sent shockwaves through the international human rights community. Judge Garzón has long been idolised for using—even stretching—his powers to seek justice for the victims of some of the most notorious human rights abuses of the modern era. The prosecutions recently launched against him alleged misconduct in relation to three separate cases investigated by the judge in his own prosecutorial role.

They have been brought by individuals who have long been opposed to what they regard as politically motivated exploitation of his professional authority.

Yet, most of us regard him as a hero. It was hard to imagine that the Spanish courts would uphold these complaints. They rejected two but have upheld one with disastrous effect.

On 9 February 2012, Judge Garzón was convicted of illegally wiretapping conversations between remand prisoners and their lawyers in a corruption case involving members of the People’s Party (PP) led by the prime minister Mariano Rajoy. Wiretapping

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll