header-logo header-logo

09 March 2012 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7504 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Justice on trial

Geoffrey Bindman QC regrets the prosecution of Judge Baltasar Garzón

The unprecedented prosecution of Judge Baltasar Garzón in Spain has sent shockwaves through the international human rights community. Judge Garzón has long been idolised for using—even stretching—his powers to seek justice for the victims of some of the most notorious human rights abuses of the modern era. The prosecutions recently launched against him alleged misconduct in relation to three separate cases investigated by the judge in his own prosecutorial role.

They have been brought by individuals who have long been opposed to what they regard as politically motivated exploitation of his professional authority.

Yet, most of us regard him as a hero. It was hard to imagine that the Spanish courts would uphold these complaints. They rejected two but have upheld one with disastrous effect.

On 9 February 2012, Judge Garzón was convicted of illegally wiretapping conversations between remand prisoners and their lawyers in a corruption case involving members of the People’s Party (PP) led by the prime minister Mariano Rajoy. Wiretapping

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll