header-logo header-logo

Justice on trial

09 March 2012 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7504 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Geoffrey Bindman QC regrets the prosecution of Judge Baltasar Garzón

The unprecedented prosecution of Judge Baltasar Garzón in Spain has sent shockwaves through the international human rights community. Judge Garzón has long been idolised for using—even stretching—his powers to seek justice for the victims of some of the most notorious human rights abuses of the modern era. The prosecutions recently launched against him alleged misconduct in relation to three separate cases investigated by the judge in his own prosecutorial role.

They have been brought by individuals who have long been opposed to what they regard as politically motivated exploitation of his professional authority.

Yet, most of us regard him as a hero. It was hard to imagine that the Spanish courts would uphold these complaints. They rejected two but have upheld one with disastrous effect.

On 9 February 2012, Judge Garzón was convicted of illegally wiretapping conversations between remand prisoners and their lawyers in a corruption case involving members of the People’s Party (PP) led by the prime minister Mariano Rajoy. Wiretapping

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll