header-logo header-logo

Willing & able?

08 March 2012 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7504 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Michael Tringham reports on invalid, void & forged wills

Two Court of Appeal decisions in long-running disputes have averted one intestacy and confirmed another.

Martin Lavin’s 2004 death-bed will was first declared invalid and his six-figure estate intestate in 2009 by Mr Geoffrey Vos QC. At the 2011 retrial fresh evidence enabled Vos J (as he had by then become) to accept the will on the grounds that Anne, Martin’s sister and sole beneficiary, had held his shaking hand to steady it while he signed. Now that decision is overturned.

Explaining why Martin’s 2002 will is to be admitted to probate, Lord Justice Lewison said (Barrett v Bem [2012] EWCA Civ 52, [2012] All ER (D) 175 (Jan)): “The testator must make some…positive and discernible communication (verbal or non-verbal) that he wishes the will to be signed on his behalf by the third party…There is no finding here that Martin asked Anne to step in and sign the will; or that Anne asked Martin whether she should sign the will before she ‘stepped

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll