header-logo header-logo

The silent killer

14 August 2015 / Richard Green
Issue: 7665 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Richard Green examines the implications of low-level asbestos exposure cases for the legal profession

The British Medical Journal (BMJ) has reported that the UK and other developed countries are on the verge of an asbestos-related disease epidemic that is likely to start this year, peaking in roughly 2020. This follows a steady rise in the number of mesothelioma cases since the early 1970s. For men, crude mortality rates increased more than 11-fold between 1970 and 2011. The rise is smaller for women, with rates increasing around 8-fold during the same period. Between the years 2000 and 2011, mortality rates have increased by 20% and 40% in men and women respectively. To put a scale on the problem, Cancer Research UK’s latest statistics indicate that in 2012 there were 2,429 deaths from mesothelioma in the UK, 84% of which were men.

Lengthy latency period

As is commonly known, the latency period between asbestos exposure and contraction of associated diseases is long—commonly between 25 and 50 years—meaning that many former tradesmen exposed to the material are now contracting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll