header-logo header-logo

14 August 2015 / Richard Green
Issue: 7665 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The silent killer

Richard Green examines the implications of low-level asbestos exposure cases for the legal profession

The British Medical Journal (BMJ) has reported that the UK and other developed countries are on the verge of an asbestos-related disease epidemic that is likely to start this year, peaking in roughly 2020. This follows a steady rise in the number of mesothelioma cases since the early 1970s. For men, crude mortality rates increased more than 11-fold between 1970 and 2011. The rise is smaller for women, with rates increasing around 8-fold during the same period. Between the years 2000 and 2011, mortality rates have increased by 20% and 40% in men and women respectively. To put a scale on the problem, Cancer Research UK’s latest statistics indicate that in 2012 there were 2,429 deaths from mesothelioma in the UK, 84% of which were men.

Lengthy latency period

As is commonly known, the latency period between asbestos exposure and contraction of associated diseases is long—commonly between 25 and 50 years—meaning that many former tradesmen exposed to the material are now contracting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll