header-logo header-logo

Silents in court!

18 November 2022 / David Hewitt
Issue: 8003 / Categories: Features , Media , Defamation
printer mail-detail
100864
Passions were often running high in the early days of cinema: David Hewitt takes a tour through some incidents which ended up in court

Silent films and the people who made them were forever finding themselves in court. And just before World War I, that was also true of the people who paid to see the films.

Sunday opening was once a real bone of contention. It was cinema proprietors who were had up for that—at least until the Electric Coliseum in Harringay was had up. When that happened, the cinema’s lawyer certainly earned his fee. All that was forbidden on a Sunday was the showing of inflammable films, he argued, and no evidence had been produced that his client’s films were of that kind. The case was dismissed and the lawyer, Archibald Bodkin, went on to become Director of Public Prosecutions (he would also try to ban James Joyce’s Ulysses).

Standing room only

But if the desire for seven-day opening reflected a huge demand for films, nothing reflected

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll