header-logo header-logo

18 November 2022 / David Hewitt
Issue: 8003 / Categories: Features , Media , Defamation
printer mail-detail

Silents in court!

100864
Passions were often running high in the early days of cinema: David Hewitt takes a tour through some incidents which ended up in court

Silent films and the people who made them were forever finding themselves in court. And just before World War I, that was also true of the people who paid to see the films.

Sunday opening was once a real bone of contention. It was cinema proprietors who were had up for that—at least until the Electric Coliseum in Harringay was had up. When that happened, the cinema’s lawyer certainly earned his fee. All that was forbidden on a Sunday was the showing of inflammable films, he argued, and no evidence had been produced that his client’s films were of that kind. The case was dismissed and the lawyer, Archibald Bodkin, went on to become Director of Public Prosecutions (he would also try to ban James Joyce’s Ulysses).

Standing room only

But if the desire for seven-day opening reflected a huge demand for films, nothing reflected

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll