header-logo header-logo

28 October 2022 / David Hewitt
Issue: 8000 / Categories: Features , Defamation , Privilege , Media
printer mail-detail

Shocks on screen: the case of Five Nights

98859
David Hewitt takes a trip back in time to a cinematic outing so outrageous, it ended up in court

In the middle of WWI, a film called Five Nights caused quite a kerfuffle—in picture houses, but also, briefly, in at least one splendid courtroom as well.

Objectionable features?

Made in West London, in the very studios from which the Ealing comedies would later emerge, the film tells the story of a dissolute young artist. He is shown wooing a Chinese woman in Alaska, falling for his own cousin and having her disrobe in front of him, and shooting a Chinese man dead. He is also shown as the father of an illegitimate child.

No one saw all this before the people of Preston did. Five Nights was shown in the town at the end of August 1915, in the old King’s Palace Theatre. But it was shown there only once.

James Watson was part of the audience that stiflingly hot Monday afternoon. It

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll