header-logo header-logo

28 October 2022 / David Hewitt
Issue: 8000 / Categories: Features , Defamation , Privilege , Media
printer mail-detail

Shocks on screen: the case of Five Nights

98859
David Hewitt takes a trip back in time to a cinematic outing so outrageous, it ended up in court

In the middle of WWI, a film called Five Nights caused quite a kerfuffle—in picture houses, but also, briefly, in at least one splendid courtroom as well.

Objectionable features?

Made in West London, in the very studios from which the Ealing comedies would later emerge, the film tells the story of a dissolute young artist. He is shown wooing a Chinese woman in Alaska, falling for his own cousin and having her disrobe in front of him, and shooting a Chinese man dead. He is also shown as the father of an illegitimate child.

No one saw all this before the people of Preston did. Five Nights was shown in the town at the end of August 1915, in the old King’s Palace Theatre. But it was shown there only once.

James Watson was part of the audience that stiflingly hot Monday afternoon. It

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher boosts structured finance practice with appointment of Will Sharp

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke grows its life sciences team with new partner hires

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal expands corporate team with twonew appointments

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
back-to-top-scroll