header-logo header-logo

25 February 2026
Issue: 8151 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals , Contempt
printer mail-detail

Fabrications lead to time behind bars

A former Commerzbank analyst has been sentenced to eight months in prison for lying during an employment tribunal hearing

Damilare Ajao claimed he was sexually harassed and assaulted by his manager, which the employment tribunal dismissed as ‘simply false and pure invention’ in 2022. The bank brought proceedings for contempt of court, and Ajao was initially sentenced to 20 months last November, in Commerzbank AG v Damilare Ajao [2025] EWHC 2904 (KB). Last week, the Court of Appeal reduced the sentence.

Philip Cameron, partner at Littler, representing Commerzbank, said: ‘This is a landmark case that could significantly affect how employees approach employment tribunal proceedings.

‘It is unprecedented for misleading or false evidence submitted to an employment tribunal to lead to a witness or a party being imprisoned. An eight-month custodial sentence is a serious outcome in contempt proceedings, which are often punished by a fine. It highlights the exceptional nature of the case and serves as the severest warning that there can be serious consequences for deliberately misleading a tribunal.’

Issue: 8151 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals , Contempt
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll