header-logo header-logo

25 February 2026
Issue: 8151 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals , Contempt
printer mail-detail

Fabrications lead to time behind bars

A former Commerzbank analyst has been sentenced to eight months in prison for lying during an employment tribunal hearing

Damilare Ajao claimed he was sexually harassed and assaulted by his manager, which the employment tribunal dismissed as ‘simply false and pure invention’ in 2022. The bank brought proceedings for contempt of court, and Ajao was initially sentenced to 20 months last November, in Commerzbank AG v Damilare Ajao [2025] EWHC 2904 (KB). Last week, the Court of Appeal reduced the sentence.

Philip Cameron, partner at Littler, representing Commerzbank, said: ‘This is a landmark case that could significantly affect how employees approach employment tribunal proceedings.

‘It is unprecedented for misleading or false evidence submitted to an employment tribunal to lead to a witness or a party being imprisoned. An eight-month custodial sentence is a serious outcome in contempt proceedings, which are often punished by a fine. It highlights the exceptional nature of the case and serves as the severest warning that there can be serious consequences for deliberately misleading a tribunal.’

Issue: 8151 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals , Contempt
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll