header-logo header-logo

Six, all out

15 June 2012
Issue: 7518 / Categories: Features , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment
printer mail-detail

How does Art 6 of the Convention apply to employers’ disciplinary proceedings, ask Alex Leslie & Stewart Duffy

Dr Mattu’s appeal against the decision of Mr Timothy Straker QC, sitting in the High Court, dealt with an issue of general interest, the applicability of Art 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights (the Convention) to employers’ disciplinary proceedings. It also deals with an issue of practical interest to those dealing with NHS disciplinary proceedings against medical staff, namely when the trust should include a medical member on the disciplinary panel.

Background

Mattu was employed in the NHS as a consultant cardiologist at Walsgrave Hospital in Coventry by the NHS trust and held an associated honorary research post at Warwick University from 1998. He was suspended from work in 2002 by the NHS trust, the allegations were investigated, the suspension was lifted in 2007, and he was given a warning in April 2008. He required re-skilling. There was then disagreement between Mattu and the NHS trust about the nature of the re-skilling programme.

By

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll