header-logo header-logo

Six, all out

15 June 2012
Issue: 7518 / Categories: Features , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment
printer mail-detail

How does Art 6 of the Convention apply to employers’ disciplinary proceedings, ask Alex Leslie & Stewart Duffy

Dr Mattu’s appeal against the decision of Mr Timothy Straker QC, sitting in the High Court, dealt with an issue of general interest, the applicability of Art 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights (the Convention) to employers’ disciplinary proceedings. It also deals with an issue of practical interest to those dealing with NHS disciplinary proceedings against medical staff, namely when the trust should include a medical member on the disciplinary panel.

Background

Mattu was employed in the NHS as a consultant cardiologist at Walsgrave Hospital in Coventry by the NHS trust and held an associated honorary research post at Warwick University from 1998. He was suspended from work in 2002 by the NHS trust, the allegations were investigated, the suspension was lifted in 2007, and he was given a warning in April 2008. He required re-skilling. There was then disagreement between Mattu and the NHS trust about the nature of the re-skilling programme.

By

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll