header-logo header-logo

15 June 2012
Issue: 7518 / Categories: Features , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment
printer mail-detail

Six, all out

How does Art 6 of the Convention apply to employers’ disciplinary proceedings, ask Alex Leslie & Stewart Duffy

Dr Mattu’s appeal against the decision of Mr Timothy Straker QC, sitting in the High Court, dealt with an issue of general interest, the applicability of Art 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights (the Convention) to employers’ disciplinary proceedings. It also deals with an issue of practical interest to those dealing with NHS disciplinary proceedings against medical staff, namely when the trust should include a medical member on the disciplinary panel.

Background

Mattu was employed in the NHS as a consultant cardiologist at Walsgrave Hospital in Coventry by the NHS trust and held an associated honorary research post at Warwick University from 1998. He was suspended from work in 2002 by the NHS trust, the allegations were investigated, the suspension was lifted in 2007, and he was given a warning in April 2008. He required re-skilling. There was then disagreement between Mattu and the NHS trust about the nature of the re-skilling programme.

By

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll