header-logo header-logo

Slater Heelis—multiple promotions

20 April 2022
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
Manchester law firm announces promotions

Greater Manchester-headquartered law firm Slater Heelis has announced a raft of internal promotions across a range of departments, including seven employees rising to the positions of Associate Partner and Associate.

Sale-based Richard Bradbury and Mohima Miah have been both promoted to the senior roles of Associate Partners.

Richard joined the Commercial Property team in 2015, specialising in landlord and tenant matters as well as acting on the acquisition and disposal of commercial properties. 

Mohima qualified in 2012 and joined Slater Heelis’ Private Client team in 2020 moving from Slater and Gordon Lawyers. Her expertise spans from Court of Protection and trusts work, to personal injury and public, occupiers’ and employers’ liability. 

In the same team, Claire MacKenzie and Jodie Newton, who specialise in Court Protection matters and wills, trusts & probate respectively, have been promoted to Associates and Basit Maqsood, who joined the Private Client department in 2021 as a Paralegal, has now started a training contract with the firm.

Rising the ranks of the Family Law team is Claire Higham, who has been with Slater Heelis for approaching six years and gained her law degree while working full-time in 2009. Claire’s team has consistently received industry recognition— ranked as both a Tier 2 firm in 2021’s Legal 500 and Chambers, and as a shortlisted “Family Law Firm of the Year: North” in the 2020 Family Law Awards. 

In the Property team, David Jones has been promoted to Associate from Solicitor, having developed strong expertise in residential conveyancing since 2005. 

Finally, advancing to an Associate position is Mark Warburton, who’s been part of Slater Heelis’ Corporate team since 2015 and has accrued significant experience in acquisitions and disposals, private equity transactions, company re-organisations and early-stage equity investment across a variety of clients. 

Slater Heelis’ Managing Partner Chris Bishop commented: 'My congratulations to all those who’ve been promoted this month, showing genuine passion for the work they do, great commitment to the firm and extraordinary drive to furthering their personal development in their respective fields.'

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Sports disputes practice launchedwith partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

Tax and succession planning offering expands with returning partner

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
back-to-top-scroll