header-logo header-logo

A sleeper in the attic

27 November 2008 / Philip Davis , Graham Ludlam
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Opinion , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Philip Davis & Graham Ludlam muse on the rights and liabilities associated with hidden treasures

In the art world there have been a number of recent high profile sales in which auctioneers have made what might politely be called “errors of judgment”, potentially opening themselves up to a variety of claims.

In January this year an item catalogued by Lawrences auctioneers in Somerset as a 19th century French claret jug, with an estimate of £100–£200 was sold at auction to an anonymous buyer for £220,000. Reports quickly followed that the purchaser believed the jug to be an 11th century Fatimid ewer with a market value significantly greater than the hammer price. Specialist dealers described the find as the “Holy Grail” and possibly the biggest sleeper ever to appear on the Islamic art market. Last month the “jug” was auctioned by Christie’s in London and fetched in excess of £3m. It had been authenticated by experts as a carved rock crystal ewer made for the court of the Fatimid rulers of Cairo

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll