header-logo header-logo

23 October 2014 / Dr Lars Mosesson
Issue: 7627 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

The sleeping dragon

monesson

What might the unintended consequences of repealing the Human Rights Act be? Lars Mosesson investigates

The Conservative party has indicated that its manifesto for the general election in 2015 will repeat their pledge to repeal “Labour’s” Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) and, possibly, to withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention). These proposals, and the campaign of attacks on judicial review and legal aid, appear to be motivated by a desire by ministers to be free to do what they want politically. Hence, it is timely to consider what the consequences would be for practitioners and others, if a new government were to seek to implement these proposals. Not only will it not be enough to repeal HRA 1998 for ministers to become free of human rights; but it might awaken a sleeping dragon.

The background to HRA 1998

The UK has chosen to be bound by the terms of the Convention since 1953, as a matter of international law. Over the years, all three main parties

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll