header-logo header-logo

24 January 2014 / Charles Brasted
Issue: 7591 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Smart casual

foxlow

Charles Brasted dresses down for a visit to Foxlow

“Casual” is not a lawyers’ word. When consultees highlight the “casual deployment of anecdote...as evidence” in purported justification of the government’s latest proposals for reform of judicial review—reforms, incidentally, that avowedly seek to restrict access to judicial oversight of the same Government's actions—it is not meant as a mark of approbation. Casual is the opposite of deliberate, careful, prepared. And the carefully-pressed chinos of the now seemingly ubiquitous dress-down Fridays of City law firms are, of course, the antithesis of casual—more care and planning has to go into the faux relaxed look of the Friday lawyer than into any number of chalk-striped suits from Ede and Ravenscroft.

So, when we booked in to the newly-opened Foxlow on St John Street in Clerkenwell and were told somewhat firmly that the dress code was casual, we had second thoughts. Not just because we did not have the time to plan suitable outfits. The penchant for informal so often translates into slapdash service, hard surfaces, noisy rooms and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll